The Dangers of a Firearm Amnesty

By Gideon Joubert

Last week saw the announcement to cabinet of a firearms amnesty for 2017. Despite many South Africans sitting in a legal grey area of expired firearm licence cards, they were to find no proposed respite from their predicament: disappointingly, the amnesty very specifically targets the circulation of illicitly-held firearms, and the statements offered give no indication of there being any effort to solving the expired licence card debacle before the onset of a court case pertaining to the matter in April.

Missed opportunities aside, you can be sure that this amnesty will be a highly-publicised event attracting praise from the usual anti-gun sycophants. They had much to crow about during the previous firearm amnesty, only to turn around and decry its results when it came to light that firearms handed in during the amnesty were leaked to criminals by corrupt police officers.

I wrote a piece in Politicsweb in response to this issue way back in 2014, and I think everything I said then is still relevant today. Are we about to see a repeat performance?

Gun control in SA has failed totally

17 June 2014

In light of recent developments regarding the SAPS supplying firearms to criminals, I think it is accurate to state that gun control in South Africa has finally failed in totality. Everything that the Firearms Control Act (FCA) of 2000 was meant to achieve has been spectacularly reversed by large scale and almost endemic corruption within the Police Service.

Reverend Alan Story of Gun Free South Africa was quick to condemn the scandal in a Politicsweb press-release, despite the fact that GFSA played a very active role in causing this debacle in the first place. When GFSA lobbied the government to change our firearm legislation back in the late 90’s they were warned by Gun Owners of South Africa and the SA Gunowners Association that not only would the changes to the law be difficult and expensive to enforce, but also that the proposed firearm amnesty, where gun owners could hand in their firearms to the SAPS for destruction, would be vulnerable to corruption and criminal exploitation.

GFSA’s official position is: “Internationally and in South Africa there is recognition that one of the most effective ways to reduce gun crime is to reduce the number of guns in circulation.” Reducing the firearms in circulation is naturally a function of the SAPS when they confiscate firearms or when citizens hand them in, as GFSA encourages law-abiding gun owners to do.

Yet instead of all these weapons being destroyed, they have ended up in the wrong hands. There has been report upon report of the SAPS losing firearms for years: one dating from 2012 states that the SAPS lost around 18 196 firearms between April 2005 and March 2011, and a more recent report claims that the SAPS lost over 1500 firearms during the last 2 years, with about 14 000 police firearms estimated to be in the possession of criminals. It is obvious that criminals using the police as a source of various types of firearms, including fully automatic rifles, is a very serious and expansive problem.

In light of the extensive exposure of police corruption in the mainstream media, I find it improbable that GFSA were not fully acquainted with the aforementioned facts. And yet they campaigned for citizens to surrender their legally owned guns to the SAPS, despite being fully aware that there is a high likelihood of these weapons finding their way into the possession of violent criminals. Had these firearms remained in the custody of their law-abiding owners, they may very well have never been supplied to criminals in the first place.

Recently GFSA fielded a televised advertisement stating that “if your stolen gun was there, so were you.” Considering the latest developments I find this advertisement to not only be incredibly disingenuous and intellectually dishonest, but also insulting in its hypocrisy. How many hundreds or possibly thousands of weapons surrendered to the police by civilians have been used by violent criminals to assist them in robbing, murdering and raping? Gun Free South Africa contributed towards making it happen.

Gun control in South Africa has failed. We have among the most restrictive and onerous firearm laws in the world, and it has failed to keep firearms out of criminal hands. Gun Free South Africa has lied to the public: it is evident that, should you surrender your firearm to the SAPS, it may very well not be destroyed but instead used against you by a potential hijacker or home invader.

I would like to see Gun Free South Africa apologise to the public for their involvement in this travesty. There are people out there who likely lost loved ones to the actions of criminals armed by GFSA’s firearms amnesty. I would like to see GFSA attempt to explain how this really isn’t their fault, but alas I rather think it is time we bid the likes of Alan Storey and his organisation adieu.

Gideon Joubert is a member of Gun Owners of South Africa. This article is written in his personal capacity.


8 thoughts on “The Dangers of a Firearm Amnesty

  1. Once again we are in a situation that should never have happened and would not have happened had firearm organisation served their members as they should. When an organisations sets itself up as the champion of it members then that is what it had better do. Issuing comments that members must obey the law no matter how bad those firearm organisations know it is is just stupid.

    Imagine Mr Mandela saying chaps we are trying our best in court in the mean time go and get your pass books. Yet some how the members of firearm organisations are to damn scared to hold officials feet in the fire. Like apartheid it is not possible to win against a corrupt, ideologically unbalanced government in governments courts. Nor will you ever negotiate anything worthwhile when you have not one person backing you? Backing to the ANC or any government for that matter is people willing to get off their bum and be counted.

    The only place this fight can be won is public pressure to remove the abomination the ANC and gun control created. Now the real heartbreak, not one firearm organisation knows how to do that an despite everyone of them having been told this is the only way. They still cling to their failed alternative of tossing your money into lawyers pockets and getting nowhere. Never in the history of South Africa have they won this fight with any court action.

    You may ask what are they doing for you? Are they showing you how you can help win and obtain safety, peace of mind, possibly lower crime rates and a removal to tax robbing bottomless pits like gun control. Would it not be better to spend that money on crime control, solving crime and arresting criminals? Do you think you could sell that to the public? Because that is all it takes to win.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s